Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


masturdebater69 last won the day on September 25 2018

masturdebater69 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About masturdebater69

  • Rank

Personal Information

  • Name

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Indiana made it to elims for the first time in their program's history, which is pretty cool.
  2. masturdebater69


    What are good drills/practices to do to improve overall skill? I don't mean spreading drills (ie spreading with a pen in your mouth, putting and between each word, etc) but things that improve other skills like efficiency, strategy, line-by-line, impact calc, etc.
  3. Willing to do some V-debates, aff or neg, just as long as you're willing to see the debate through to the end.
  4. How exactly does ndt participation affect overall college debate participation?
  5. Slightly off-topic, but what happened to UChicago's policy team?
  6. https://www.speechanddebate.org/topics/ It's officially arms sales........ Looks like we're in for a third year of a billion tiny soft-left affs and bad generics.
  7. Now that NSDA voting is out, which topic do you think will win and which will you be voting for? Both arm sales and nukes seem like they will be big topics, but there might actually be decent topic DAs for the first time in a while. My problem with nukes is its bidirectionality and that there's really only one impact, but on the other hand, it seems interesting and could wind up being awesome.
  8. On tabroom if you log in on the account you use to register to the tournament you'll find a tab on the tournament page that says prefs, click on that and you'll find a spreadsheet with every judge for the tournament. You can look at their paradigm by clicking their name, and based off that you give them a rating by bubbling a number on that spreadsheet 1- whatever number the tournament goes to (for example 1-8 for glenbrooks) where 1 is best and lowest number is the worst + S if you want to strike them. Typically you have to pref a certain number of judges a certain rating, such as a maximum or minimum for each rating.
  9. I thought that topic was awesome, but to be fair I was a novice and in my area they restrict novice cases to four.
  10. I definitely agree that the first two topics stand out as the best. While I haven't looked into it much, I think Middle East would be bad because Iran would say no, Syrian instability would deck solvency, leaving only really Saudi Arabia. Nuclear Policy would be interesting, my only problem with it is it's bidirectionality, which be underlimiting. Treaties is the worst in my opinion, where there are really only 5 cases but the aff is allowed to spike out of any parts of the treaties that neg may have DAs to.
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use